June 2010

To Track or Not to Track

Nonprofits walk a fine line between tracking excessive amounts of information about their constituents that bog us down with data entry and superfluous facts, and tracking too little information that cause vital information to be lost. Both ends of this spectrum can create inefficiencies in your constituent management process.

Here at Idealware we are slowly but surely transitioning into a new constituent database. This process has been a little odd, as we are now running off of two systems at one time- the old one to manage our donations and emailing (events too), and the new one to manage our sales processes for trainings, reports and articles, the Field Guide to Software for Nonprofits, and corporate sponsorships. For the context of this blog, let’s focus on the new database that deals with our sales process (so no donation tracking).

Before beginning to use the new database, we planned and planned to make sure we were creating a structure that would suit our needs. But inevitably, even the best plan, when tested in the field, has some flaws. And so we have been slowly tweaking and moving around information to get things looking the way we need. Here are the key things we track with our constituents:

  • Basic contact info (name, title, organization, address, phone, fax, email, website, etc.)
  • Relationships (who works where and who knows who)
  • Touch points (we keep detailed records of each of our interactions with people and organizations)
  • Status (are they active, should we wait to contact them for 6 months, are they “dead to us”?)
  • Sales opportunities and products sold (we track the process of selling customized trainings, reports or articles, Field Guide licenses, etc.)
  •  Upcoming tasks (we keep a tickler system going to help us manage the sales process)


How does this compare to what you are tracking for sales processes? What else should nonprofits think about when tracking data?

Salesforce, Chatter, and user expectations about data

 Many organizations using or evaluating Salesforce or Convio’s Common Ground ask about “Chatter.” Salesforce calls the now-in-beta Chatter its “real-time collaboration cloud.” Trying to explain Chatter may be met with interest, skepticism or boredom. I suspect that over time, it will represent a change that will be attractive and mirrored in many contact and data systems.

Salesforce chatter

Please bear with me in the comments that follow: I have used Chatter at conferences though no one we work with has taken part in the beta. Yet I have seen enough of it to recommend a close look for three reasons.

New options for organizing and present data

First, most people do get used to Salesforce's way of presenting information, its menus and data management pages have one standard look. Yes, the default interface has been Web 2.0 refreshed a bit this year, but the basic layout remains. The only way around this involves costly programming pages from scratch--doable yet  reducing Salesforce's implementation advantages.
 
Chatter will immediately offer users an alternative interface for finding and viewing important  data. And it will be the now pervasive interface of blogs and social networks. To me it means that a mix of senior staff and casual users especially will be able to find and follow organizations, projects, prospects as needed without the sense of using a database. I suspect they will like it. 

Enabling users to Friend the contacts and projects you need to follow

Second, Chatter will give Salesforce users more control over their “favorites.” Salesforce search tools work well, with lots of options. And database admins can create views and profiles that give select users the lists they want. This is not the same level of individualized control that users of social networking sites have come to depend on. A core concept of Chatter is that you will be able to “friend” a donor prospect, a project you are interested in, a forthcoming event—or any other built-in or custom object you want to follow. It will be familiar and easy. 
 
Like other database systems, Salesforce’s security and view/reporting tools are geared  to specifying  which categories of data I should check every week. Or they can easily restrict what data I cannot see because it sits outside of my domain. I suspect that the larger the organization or active database, the most users will take to the idea of selecting in a positive way the things  they want to follow.
 
It may take some getting used to. I have been watching comments on the nonprofit Salesforce email list and know that some beta users, including folks I know and trust, have skepticism. I could be wrong, but once Chatter comes out of beta and there is more documentation and use cases for it, I suspect it will catch on.
 
Worth noting is an unpublished survey result  from the Salesforce Foundation that close to 85% of nonprofit  users report that it has significantly helped them improve internal team and staff collaboration. I’m not surprised there. It is one of the things that we find refreshingly easier to support than in other data systems. If this is true, then Chatter will  give more options for what is attractive already.

Monitoring Public Social Media from the inside 

Third, and last for me for now is the prospect of easier integration with public social media sites like Facebook and Twitter. I put this third because many nonprofits are wrestling with what level of integration they want to have with these services. Chatter is more about  private means for managing staff and volunteer collaboration than about blurring the boundaries between public and private social networking. 
 
Yet already some large companies are using add-ons to monitor and respond to social media threads within Salesforce. They can use these add-ons to improve their customer service or marketing channels. It gives them new options for tracking and responding to their customers and prospects.
 
I do wonder whether part of the reason why it is taking so long for Chatter to come out of beta has to do with challenges in figuring out what and how to make this public/private integration happen.  We’ll have to  see on this one, including how it will work for  smaller organizations already struggling to find time to monitor social media. The important thing is not to conflate Chatter’s promise with the public social media. 
 
*   *   * 
Still skeptical? Interestingly, though not as automatic as Chatter promises to be, thinking in blog or social media format works now as an architecture to present data in Drupal, and yes, it is attractive. It is also the natural groove for  communication tools such as Basecamp or Central Desktop. It is what makes them relatively easy to promote for project management. I suspect that if Chatter catches on, other contact management  systems will quickly offer similar features.  I'm more interested in whether this is part of the reshaping of the shape of database architectures of the near future than whether Salesforce gets it right this summer.  We’re all getting used to these interfaces, including as a way of compactly presenting data on mobile phones and such. When it arrives in a few months, Chatter will aim to, hmm, bite into all this.
 

 

A Tweet into the Ether

 Our survey about usage of Twitter is still open (if you use Twitter and haven't taken, please do!  Or spread the word, especially outside the nonprofit and technology world), but one fact is quite clear from it:  

Your followers may well not actually be paying any attention to you.

Currently, survey respondents officially follow, on average, 385 people each.  How many do they actively pay attention to (i.e. when they're checking Twitter, they see the person's tweets)?  81, on average.  21%.
 
When you add to the fact that many people aren't constantly monitoring Twitter, and that most miss tweets that went out when they weren't monitoring it, you see a picture of Twitter as kind a "post into the ether" -- you can tweet, and some people are likely listening, but it's very hard to know who or how many.
 
I'm still thinking of the implications of this for our Social Media Decision Guide.  How does this affect the ways that a nonprofit should use Twitter?  Thoughts?

New article: Measuring the Effectiveness of Your Online Communications

 I was worried about re-creating the wheel with our new article, Measuring the Effectiveness of Your Online Communications, but I'm pretty happy with the way it came out.  We propose breaking the world of online metrics into four kinds -- Views, Followers, Engagement, and Conversion-- which is helpful in forcing you to define what you actually want to measure in terms of your communication goals.

Thanks to TechSoup for the financial support of the article!

In Seach of Phone Banking Software

So here's a piece of software that seems pretty useful...imagine this scenario:

You have a bunch of volunteers mobilized to call constituents. Perhaps they're calling previous donors, to ask them to donate again.  Or they're calling around the community, to encourage people to come to a hearing.  Regardless, they'll need a call list with names and numbers, and some way to note who they spoke to and what people said.

You can certainly do this on paper, but then some poor smuck has to enter all the information as to who was reached and what their response was into the database.  Seems like something that software would be useful for, huh?  So I'm envisioning a tool that would provide volunteers with only their own list (or even just the next person to call), maybe over the web, so they could be either in person or remote.  And then they would get a little form for them to enter response information that would then go straight into a database, for easy loading into your constituent management system.

Sounds useful, huh?  And pretty simple. But I can't find anything like it that's straightforward and  reasonably priced.  This type of functionality sometimes comes packaged with expensive university management software, but that doesn't make sense if you're not a university.  Sungard offers SmartCall, but it's functionality is way overkill for most organizations.  MoveOn uses this functionality to mobilize remote phone-a-thon type actions, but they built it themselves.

What do you think?  Does anyone know of straightforward software to do this?

Are YOU talking to ME?

Taxi Driver(With apologies to Pacino and Scorsese)

I'm working with several nonprofits that are making major technology changes (moving from Outlook/Exchange to Google Apps, selecting a new donor database) and it seems they want to "leave it to the techies" to make the decisions and handle the process.   Obviously not a smart strategy, especially when you consider the dramatic impact these changes are going to have on the organizations and people.

That means it's up to us, the techies, to make sure that we get the right people involved.  Make sure you're talking to the people who are going to be most affected by the technology decisions, and be getting their input right from the start.  In one of these situations, we didn't get (a very important) someone's feedback until much later in the process, and we had to backtrack to incorporate their input, and it had a big impact on a technology choice, all because they weren't involved from the beginning. 

Make sure you've got representation from all the areas of the organization, even if they think "this won't impact me, it's just a tech thing."  Once you've got this "Technology Council" together, it's up to you to make sure you're bringing critical things regularly to this group.  It's very easy to get in the mindset of "I'll just handle this" when sometimes it's important to get people from different areas of the organization to give feedback.  

So make sure people are talking to you, and if they're not, start talking to them!  That's the only way you're going to get some decisions made on technology!

Donor Wealth Screening

We were recently asked if Idealware had done any research or comparisons about donor wealth screening service providers.  Unfortunately, we haven’t looked deeply into that topic, but did cover it a little in our Field Guide to Software for Nonprofits, excerpted here:  

“You can also buy more detailed demographic data to help assess donors’ income levels, often called “wealth screening data.” For instance, which donors live in a high-wealth Zip code, or own yachts? What’s the assessed value of their houses (if that information is public)? What political contributions have they made? If you have a very large database, some vendors can even mine your own data to help predict your top prospects.

Wealth screening services like LexisNexis for Development Professionals, WealthPoint, WealthEngine.com, Target Analytics and PRO Prospect Research offer multiple types of data, and many can provide information on either a single donor (through a web interface) or an entire list.”

Overall, we feel that donor wealth screening is a useful tool, but seems to be more within reach for larger organizations such as museums, hospitals and universities with sizable budgets and large lists.  If you do decide to do wealth screening and you don’t have a big budget, consider using it on your own list as an evaluation tool to find out more about your current supporters- who is a potentially major donor masquerading as a small donor?  Wealth screening can be problematic as a prospecting tool for a general pool of people who are not necessarily associated with your cause.  The tools will identify wealthy people, but can’t tell you who is likely to give, and especially can’t tell you who is likely to give to your organization. 

You can also use wealth screening tools to find out more about individual donors (say you were going to a house party and wanted to learn more about the people on the guest list) but we are unfamiliar with the price for use in this manner- do fees make one-time prospecting in this way impractical for small organizations?  

It seems that donor wealth screening is a cost effective and proven method for organizations with substantial money for prospecting, but is it practical for those with smaller budgets?  What are the work arounds that some of you at smaller organizations use to find out the giving capacity of your donors and potential donors?

Idealware's Social Media Consultant Directory- Only One Week Left to Get Listed!

Looking to get the word out to nonprofits about your social media services?  Or just want to show yourself as part of the nonprofit social media consulting community?  Get an affordable listing in Idealware’s social media consultant directory, released in conjunction with our Nonprofit Social Media Decision Making Guide.

View more information or sign up now at http://www.idealware.org/social-media-consultant-directory   The deadline for listing is June 15th.

Idealware’s Nonprofit Social Media Decision Making Guide will use research-based findings to help nonprofits determine what types of social media is likely to work for them.   Based on the results of six months of research, the Decision Making Guide will provide a process to define which social media channels are likely to be the most effective based on their goals, audience, and the time they’re able to commit.  It will close with a directory of the consultants who can help them define and execute a social media strategy.

The Decision Making Guide will reach an audience of nonprofits eager to understand social media  -- we estimate that about 5,000- 10,000 will download the report (our Consumers Guide to Low Cost Donor Management Report has been downloaded more than 7,500 times; our Open Source CMS report  almost 12,000). Reading the Guide will give them a sense of the right direction to go, but in many cases they’ll want to turn to a consultant to fully outline and implement a strategy. Make sure you are listed in the directory of consultants who can help them navigate that process!  

Want to reach even more people?  Consider a half-page ad in the directory, or a lead sponsorship of the report (to allow people to opt in to your resources on the registration page), or even sponsorship of the Idealware website itself (more info on that at http://www.idealware.org/sponsor-idealware)

We’d love to work with you. The Social Media Consultant Directory is already shaping up to be a definitive listing of the consultants working in the social media space, and listings are priced on a sliding scale (starting at $45 for independent consultants or small firms!) to help make sure everyone can participate.  Don’t be left out!

Get more information, or get listed now: http://www.idealware.org/social-media-consultant-directory  Remember, the deadline for listing is June 15th.

Test your Internet speed

In all the debate about Net Neutrality  (whether commercial internet providers can treat different kinds of content differently in order to control their customer bases and profitability), there is a basic reality that most of us don't know much about the cost effectiveness of choosing Comcast, Verizon or other Internet providers. In particular, not surprisingly, most people in the US have little idea of the speed of their Internet connection and how that compares with monthly costs and fees. A survey by the FCC this spring showed that 80% of consumers in the US don't know the speed of their connection. 

I just checked my home Comcast "my account" page and can't find a reference to promised speed. I have personally checked our speed and know that it varies over time, both "upstream" (to the Internet) and "downstream" (back to us). Our office business Verizon account did come with options for speed, but we have never scientifically verified it.

Everyone has had days at work where people go around saying, "The Internet is slow today," and maybe it is, but for most, there is no built in way to test. There are tools that you can use to do this, and one now provided by the FCC  is at www.broadband.gov

More interestingly,  the FCC has paired with SamKnows to enlist a represenative national sample of broadband customers to systematically verify Internet speeds. If you are interested, please sign up here:  https://www.testmyisp.com SamKnows is an independent broadband watchdog started in England. I signed up, and will see what happens when they contact me. You may want to as well.

 

 

Help Spread the Word about TechSoup's Donation Program

 Whenever I lead seminars with groups of smaller or grassroots nonprofit organizations, I'm alarmed at how many don't know that they can get discounted software from TechSoup.  I  talked to a group where none of the 30 participants had heard of TechSoup. 

And in fact, TechSoup's doing a webinar next week to introduce the donation program.  Can you help spread the word?  Here's the details:

Get Started with TechSoup's Product Donation Program

Thursday, June 10 11 a.m. Pacific time

Does your nonprofit or public library need better technology? Wish you had the latest version of that pricey software? Or sturdier hardware?

Learn more about TechSoup's product donation program and how to get started with this free webinar. Join TechSoup, get registered, learn what it means to be qualified and eligible for different donation and discount programs, and start requesting donations.

This webinar will walk you through all the steps of getting started and help you get on your way to low-cost, high-quality technology to help your organization run smoother and meet your mission. This webinar is best for people brand new to TechSoup or whose organization or library may be registered but are just not sure how to get started. TechSoup’s donation programs are open to eligible nonprofits and public libraries.