September 2006

Last chance to register for the blogging webinar

The first webinar in our NTEN and Idealware Software Review Series is coming up tomorrow, on Choosing a Blogging Tools. What should you look for in a tool? Which is the right one for you? We’ll talk through the features, prices, pros and cons of the seven most commonly used blog tools, look at screenshots and demos, and make recommendations for which ones might work best for you.

We'd love to see you there! If you're an Idealware eNews subscriber, check your last eNewsletter or email info@idealware.org for info about how to get the eNews price ($60).

View more or register now on the NTEN site >

Confidence in nonprofits

Paul Light and NYU Wagner have released the latest installment of their ongoing research into consumer confidence in charitable organizations

Results were somewhat paradoxical: while those that expressed, in general, a great deal or fair amount of confidence in nonprofits increased since 2002, many of the detailed indicators of confidence remained essentially unchanged:
  • 18 percent of Americans said charitable organizations do a very good job running their programs and services, compared with 19 percent in 2005
  • 71 percent of Americans said that charitable organizations waste a great deal or fair amount of money, up from 66 percent in 2005 and 60 percent in October 2003 when the question was first asked.
  • 73 percent said charities have the right priorities, but do not spend money wisely.
(there’s a lot more – the report is certainly worth a full read).

The report concludes:
Further investments in the ability of charitable organizations to deliver programs and services may be the most important approach to sustaining and increasing the recent gains in confidence…These investments in performance, while hard to generate, not only improve performance, they help charitable organizations make a stronger case that they are, indeed, helping people and delivering programs and services effectively. Charitable organizations do not need to do a better job showing the faces of the people they help—Americans already believe they have the right priorities. Rather, charities need to do a better job showing that they actually achieve their missions and produce measurable results. Such proof of success is virtually impossible to generate without the administrative backbone needed for increased transparency and accountability.

Bravo! I’m thrilled to read a report on confidence that doesn’t focus primarily on transparency. I couldn’t agree more: if many people feel that nonprofits don’t spend money wisely, that’s not just a PR issue. We need to think carefully about whether nonprofits *are actually* spending money wisely, and if not what we can do as a sector to help.

More effective software, anyone?

Tremendous new nonprofit software report

Dot Organize has released their much anticipated report summarizing a detailed survey of software usage by small progressive nonprofits. The report doesn’t disappoint – it provides a number of interesting insights and recommendations, as well as a platform to allow users to search for, add, and comment on tools for small advocacy organizations.

View the report here: http://www.dotorganize.net/report/introduction

New articles: Joomla, Drupal, Plone, and Case Management Systems

The September Idealware articles are up!

First off, we have an article comparing Joomla, Drupal, and Plone which I'm pretty excited about: Comparing Open Source CMSs: Joomla, Drupal, and Plone. We used a bit of a different technique for writing it - we roped in proponents of each of the three systems to give us a demo and answer questions, and then summarized our findings. I think it worked pretty well - let us know what you think. Thanks to our CMS champions: Ryan Ozimek of PICnet, Zack Rosen of CivicSpace Labs, and Jon Stahl of ONE/ Northwest.

And we have a new Few Good Tool article: A Few Good Case Management Tools. We talked to eight experts about case management for human service organizations, and rounded up the applications they've found useful.

Enjoy!

NTEN and Idealware Webinar Series

We’re thrilled to announce that we’ve teamed up with NTEN to offer a series of online seminars – webinars – this fall. These seminars will include all the candid advice and product comparisons of the reports and articles on which they are based, but we'll offer plenty of extra guidance and insights straight from the author. I’ll be presenting most of the webinars myself, but you’ll also hear from Idealware contributors such as Robert Weiner.

We’re kicking off the series with Choosing a Blogging Tool, which will be chock full of examples and screenshots covering blogging tool features and comparing the seven most commonly used tools. Also included in the series are Getting Started with Online Donations, 10 Common Mistakes When Choosing Donor Databases, Choosing an eNewsletter Tool, and Comparing Open Source CMSs: Joomla, Drupal and Plone. Read more or register now>

All webinars are $60 for NTEN members and Idealware eNewsletter subscribers, or otherwise $100. Email info@idealware.org to get your Idealware eNews registration code, or stay tune for details in this week's September eNews.

Results from the Vendor Funding Survey

We got a great response to our survey – 155 responses! And well more than half of the people responded wrote in comments. Thanks so much for your help – it means a lot to us that so many of you weighed in to help us make this decision.

And the results (drumroll please):
  • In general, you felt that vendor funding would have little affect on whether you would read a case management report - 84% of you agreed that you would read the report if it was foundation funded, compared to 79% if it was vendor funded.
  • Similarly, the vendor funding had little effect on whether you felt you would use it to make software decisions – 74% agreed you would use the foundation funded, while 63% agreed they would use a vendor funded report.
  • And a whopping 85% agreed that a vendor funded report was better than no report at all
  • However, 61% agreed that they would question the impartiality of a vendor funded report
  • And 34% felt that if Idealware accepted vendor funded for a report, they would be less likely to trust Idealware resources overall.

Want to see the comments? Download them now. They are complete and unedited, except that I’ve removed people’s names and email addresses where they wrote them in. Note that those who agreed they would trust Idealware less if we accepted vendor funding were notably more likely to comment (72% of these folks commented vs. 52% of those who disagreed with this question), so the comments are skewed toward the "don't do it" direction.

While all of the rest of the results seem to support the idea that this vendor funded report would be better than nothing and people would take it with a grain of salt, I'm very concerned about the 34% who would be less likely to trust Idealware resources overall. More details as we work through our options.

And a plea to the ether: Someone wrote in the comments "We are a nonprofit organization that takes on funding from industry. Like you are considering, our funders have no editorial control over our content and our writers don't know where the money is coming from." I would love to talk to you, but I don’t know who you are. Are you out there? Can you email me (laura@idealware.org)? Anyone know what organization this is?