August 2011

Tips for Software Trainings

For an quick, inside look at how Idealware manages so many successful on-line trainings, take a look at Andrea Berry’s post, http://idealware.org/blog/askidealware-how-does-idealware-prepare-seminars. Like Idealware seminars themselves, Andrea is clear and to the point -- focus the subject matter, prepare an outline and organize the content.  Of course, as Andrea pointed out, Idealware does three to five seminars a week. What about the occasional, or even first time presenter, facing a roomful of new users of complex software? Here are some thoughts on preparing for trainings that maybe pick up where Andrea left off. They come from recently helping two members of a project team prepare to lead their first software training ever. 

First a general thought. Even if you haven’t done a lot of training, draw on your own style. Everyone has one. The two people doing the sessions I was helping on are experienced speakers and presenters in their profession, just not in technology training. Whatever makes you good in other circumstances, you should use in training. From there, consider what’s different. 
 

Organizing the Presentation 

It’s tempting to start from the beginning and walk through the menus and pages from end to end. And since you probably know those menus and functions yourself, it’s also tempting to figure, it will be a piece of cake to just log in and walk the new users through it all. 
 
Taking that approach will likely exhaust your audience. And you may also bump into some feature that doesn’t do what you want it to. No matter how much the multi-tasker you consider yourself, there is something about holding the group’s attention while typing on a projected screen that leads to trouble.  
 

Yes to Slides?  

Instead, pick out two or three representative complete scenarios—a case, a project, a client, a grant, etc-- and walk through all the steps you will take  in advance. Whether you need to rehearse exactly what you will say is more a matter of speaking style. At least list out step-by-step all the clicks and entries you will make. Then, whether you have to write out your remarks, you an annotate the steps with essential tips or commentary. 
 
For this, you might find it helpful to make a slide show. For the heart of the demo part of the training, you can make a series of screen shots with clickable links to key live pages. Then, alternative those screen shot slides, with slides with your lessons and tips. (Or put them in the notes or otherwise note them.) 
 
Having the slides also can be insurance against disaster—no Internet access, problems with the software that day, or anything else. Also, like any other presentation, use introductory slides to set goals and expectations. 
 

Like a TV Cooking Demonstration 

Now go one step further. You might take a page from Julia Child and all the cooking shows that have followed. On TV, we often see the beginning steps live in great detail. Then the chef jumps to a view of the finished product to give all the hot tips. In a training, have examples of those same two or three scenarios all set up in reserve. You can start with live entry and then jump to commenting on a completed example at any point. 
 
A variation. Instead of walking through a small number of situations in detail, it sometimes works for me to think of, say, a dozen top daily or periodic tasks staff will face. They can be in order of likelihood instead of order of entry. Do the training as a series of "how to" mini tutorials, instead of an end to end walk through of the whole system. Could this come across as disjointed? Sure. Yet is could also come across more the way we use good web help, jumping first to the Frequently Asked Questions section and seeing if we can find quick lessons there.  
 
If you take this approach, you can list the mini lessons as topics on an easel pad sheet (or a slide page you can return to), and check them off as you go through them. Suppose each one takes 10 minutes (with questions), that's a real framework for watching the time. Checking each one off will help your patient participants mete out their own attention. And if you do them in priority order, even if you have to adjust your time, you will know you have hit the most important things.
 
By the way, one of the best software manuals I have used, for the somewhat obscure Maptitude desktop GIS software, works really well in this mini-lesson format. Each new sections starts with one or more 60 second tutorials. Sometimes that’s all you need, without reading the detailed reference.
 
If you have the luxury of two presenters, it really makes sense that while one person talks, the other works the screens. You can switch back and forth, yet avoid having the same person to have one person doing most of the talking 4. Consider, one of you talking and one using the computer--shift back and forth, but avoid the speaking and clicking at same time.   
 

Interactive Doesn't Have to Mean Hands-On 

Hands on training is often a luxury trainers can afford: there isn't enough time on the schedule; the room is not set-up for it; the participants are not ready yet for that.  You can make your session highliy interactive even without the hands-on, and be all the more succesfful. 

How can you anticipate those investable things that don’t go right when presenting software details in front of a crowd? One idea is to put up  easel pad pages with headings something like: "suggestions for improvements" and "training follow-ups." Then you can note trouble spots or questions that mire things down, and just move on.  By putting up the sheets in advance, you signal both openness to ideas as well as insistence that you have a schedule and  not everything can get settled during the training.

It can help to give a long training a pacing and rhythm. Don’t wait until the end for discussion phases. Here are three important back-and-forth elements you ought to cover, and you can use as natural change of pace topics within the overall outline.
 
First, address fears. Users of new software will bring fears and anxieties to the training. Those issues will distract them, so its much better to take them up along the way. Will the system increase my workload? Can I still get the same lists I used to get, however clunky the process? 
 
Second, making time for follow-up. Staff who have a day off for training may have more work to come back to the day or two afterwards. It really can make a difference in internalization of the learning to make time in advance to try out the system. It helps to give participants time to talk about their plans to put the training to use, maybe finding a learning buddy and making a date, thinking about what cases or clients to try it out on and what paper work will be needed in advance to focus on using the new system, and other practical steps..
 
Third, address security and privacy concerns staff may have with the new system. If the new system is more comprehensive in what it collects and measures, best to talk through issues staff may have. 
 
One last audio visual aid: have yet another easel pad sheet with top tips to remember. Even if you have them on slides, it can help to write them on a fresh list based on reaction in the room as you go through things. If the wording partly reflects comments on mood in the room as you do the training, it will make them more memorable. You can send them out as a follow-up.
 
I hope these points help. Unlike Andrea, I speak as someone who doesn’t do training every day. And I often have anxiety going into trainings especially where it’s on software I have helped select or configure. Basic iIdeas like these help me get through, and I hope for you as well. 
 

 

AskIdealware: Friend-to-Friend Fundraising

If your organization hasn't tried friend-to-friend fundraising techniques, let Andrea Berry convince you it's time to take a look.

 

AskIdealware: Hosted or Installed Software?

What's the difference between hosted and installed software? Our always-insightful senior researcher Jay Leslie breaks down these two categories of software systems in this week's installment of AskIdealware. Got a question for us? Email it along and maybe we'll answer it with a video.

 

 

 

Q & A: A Basic Introduction to LinkedIn

I just got an introductory question about LinkedIn from a training participant, and realized that many of you might be asking similar questions. I thought I'd share my answer with you all...

Mary Grace's Question:  
What brief overview can you give me about LinkedIn? I am not yet on, but keep getting invitations to connect with folks on it. Do you think this might be a good means for me to find adult ed instructors? I think I get the general gist -  it sort of seems like Facebook, but for professional connections - am I close?

My Answer:
Regarding LinkedIn, yes, you are right. In essence it has the capacity to be a social network like Facebook for professional connections. Some people use it this way- they connect what they are posting on Twitter to their LinkedIn account, post what they are doing, etc.  
 
However, I don't think this is really the best way for us small nonprofit staff to use LinkedIn. You should think about it as the most true form of online networking. Essentially a place to collect contacts, more like a constantly updating Rolodex. With one great addition, you have access to all the Rolodexs of your contacts! As a fundraiser, that makes me salivate. That capacity allows me to peer into my Board member's contacts (as well as other core supporters). I can play the "who knows this person" game that so frustrates us at fundraising committee meetings before the meeting even gets started. I can see who knows the Bank President or that Board member at the local foundation and approach that connection directly to help me make an ask or get an introduction. Fantastic! This translates well into your situation. If you know of someone in the community who you think would be a good candidate for a instructor position, you could find them on LinkedIn and see who you knew who knew them and ask for an introduction.  
 
On the basic level, LinkedIn is a way to publicly post your resume. When I worked as a contractor that was extremely valuable. My current clients would recommend me to a potential client who would check out my resume even before contacting me. It was a nice way to promote my skills and experience in often a much more personable way than a website. You could definitely use LinkedIn as a way to double check the references of potential Adult Ed teachers, and search for skills that you would like to cultivate (for example, looking for people who worked as a web designer to potentially lead a "Basic Websites Class")  
 
Nonprofits are also more and more using LinkedIn as a way to facilitate online discussions and forums. There are likely ways you could use this to your advantage, such as creating a forum for adult education concepts and best practices, but I don't think that makes sense for your organization right now given all of the other things on your plate! On the flip side, I am sure a forum like the above exists, and it might be worthwhile joining to gain access to a network of Adult Education professionals who can help you answer your tough questions. See this search for some examples: http://www.linkedin.com/groupsDirectory?results=&sik=1312852057634&pplSearchOrigin=GLHD&keywords=adult+education 
 
For a more detailed description as to what nonprofits can do with LinkedIn, I'd check out this well-done blog post from Community organizer 2.0: http://www.communityorganizer20.com/2011/06/15/linkedin-for-nonprofits/
 

Remember Why You Joined in the First Place

 When I asked around the office “Why did you join Facebook?” Idealware staff shared the following reasons: 

 
To announce that I was pregnant and then to share pictures of my daughter with friends and family easily
Kicking and screaming. My agent forced me to.
I was in college when it first came out, and it was the "new" thing. It was a big deal when my university was "turned on".
To see what it was about and to keep in touch with work colleagues
To stay in touch with friends from high school when we all went off to different colleges.
I joined in 2007 to see who I could dredge up from my past.
 
No one said “to hear about breaking news." No one said “to watch commercials for brands I am interested in." And of course, no one said “I joined Facebook to hear about what my favorite nonprofits are doing.” 
 
Unfortunately, as nonprofit staff members, as we put up our Facebook posts and go about our Facebook routines, we often forget this important point.  Your constituents may have decided they want to receive updates from you on Facebook, but you are not the reason they are logging in.  When you post a continuous newsfeed about your organization- what you want people to do and why they should support you-  your constituents will eventually tune you out.  It is our job as nonprofit communications staff to remember that this is a social media.  We need to ask questions, engage our constituents, do things that start and continue conversations.  We need our posts to fit comfortably between the picture of cousin Fred at the baseball game and Beth’s check in at the local bar. 
 
Yes, our constituents like to hear about the great things we are doing, but don’t forget that they want to feel invited to participate instead of like they are watching a commercial. 
 
How do you make your posts memorable?  How do you fit into the stream of photos of friends’ children, sports talk and posts about drinking binges?  We need to ask ourselves these questions on a regular basis. Engagement is the key…the more we can emulate the social nature of our own posting and the postings of our friends, the further this tool will take us and our nonprofits.  
 

AskIdealware: How Much Website Traffic Should You be Getting?

How much website traffic should you be getting? Laura Quinn reveals a few ways to think about website analytics.

The Geometry of Clouds

So, I’ve got files stashed in Windows Live SkyDrive and multiple Google Docs accounts, photos on Picasaweb, myriad transient stuff in Dropbox, and videos stashed away on YouTube. I’ve got most of my electronic life up in the cloud these days, which is great! I can get at whatever I want from wherever I have an Internet connection, and how often am I away from the Internet? Want to show pictures of my kid to the newbie at work? Log in to picasaweb.com and I can bore him at will. At the supermarket and need to by the ingredients for the family BBQ sauce recipe (which I don’t have memorized)?  Docs.google.com from my Droid mobile, login and there’s the recipe. Video of strange lights in the sky over lake Mooselookmeguntic? Youtube.com (I don’t actually believe in little green men).

 The problem with all this is that there is no “cloud.” There are “clouds” and to figure out which one to go for what can be a royal PITA. In fits of frustration,  I sometimes I shake my fist at the sky and rant about the need to give the clouds more structure and shape.
 
Then I had this brilliant idea: wouldn’t it be great if I could access all my stuff in the cloud as easily as I can find things on my laptop? Something that gave me icons for my hosted apps and let me query across all of my cloud accounts from a simple search box to find what I’m looking for. “Oh, boy!” I thought, “I’m gonna be the next Mark Zuckerberg!” Then I did a few quick searches and found JoliCloud--Your desktop in the cloud. Deflated, I decided to download it and give it a whirl.
 
Once installed, Jolicloud  got me a nice smartphone-like grid of  app-like links to a few presuggested resources. Not much different from Chrome’s Apps, I thought. Then I found a screen that let me see my Dropbox and Windows Live Skydrive files, side by side, from one interface. Ah, things were getting interesting. There's still no unified cross-cloud search, though.
 
 I'm sure the good folks at JoliCloud have thought this, too, and I'm sure the reason is neither technical in nature nor a lack of creativity. This gaping hole in the cloud is likely--in my somewhat cynical opinion-- purely economic and political. Could be that different cloud vendors, who are often competitors, might be reluctant to simplify your life in ways that might obscure their brand by making their service just another resource in someone else's interface. Hard to sell ads in that universe.
 
So the quest continues for the perfect cloud desktop tool but for the time being, JoliCloud, however, has moved the ball forward and they are definitely a service I'll keep on my radar and a new JoliCloud is in beta testing as I type, so stay tuned.. Exciting time, indeed.

AskIdealware: What's It Like To Work Remotely?

 Did you know that Idealware is in both Portlands? While the main office is in Maine, Chris Bernard, our Senior Editor, lives and works in Oregon. We "sat down" with Chris for a closer look at how he does his job from all the way across the country.

Chris is currently on a three week trip through Alaska to work on his new book. In case you missed it yesterday, read more about his adventures here

Follow Chris's Alaskan Adventures

 Chris Bernard, Idealware's Senior Editor, is on one heck of an Alaskan trip.  In addition to his full time job at Idealware, he's writing a book (Chasing Alaska, Lyons Press, Spring 2013) about his own ancestor, Joe Bernard, who was an actual, honest-to-goodness arctic explorer, and the Alaska that Chris finds as he follows in Joe's footsteps.  So yes, he's a pretty busy guy.

 He's currently in Alaska, on, I believe stop two or three of about a twenty-stop trip. He's taking planes, boats, and driving overland, including going several places it's only possible to get to via float plane.  He's working on a commercial fishing boat, walking trap lines with a hunter, going to a bunch of historical societies -- and as he goes, interviewing about fifty people.
 
So it should be an amazing three-week trip.  Follow his adventures (on this trip, and as the book unfolds) on his blog, also called Chasing Alaska.
 

Waiting for Holograms

A lot of people ask me what I see coming up next in the world of nonprofit technology.  I admit it:  I'm not a very good pundit, and I don't like making prognostications. So my routine answer is "holographic software."  It's mostly a joke, but I also often follow it up to explain that the things that are likely to have the biggest impact are the things we can't even conceptualize today.  
 
More concerningly, though, a number of nonprofits are trying to see the future in order to make today's decisions.  In conducting trainings I get questions that are variations on this theme all the time.  So for instance, "Is it worth investing in a donor management system now, when things are changing so fast?"  "If we try to get started with mobile texting now, is it likely that people will have moved on to something else before we get up and running?"
 
I have several answers to this.  First, things don't move THAT fast.  Absolutely, things change, but markets generally change over the course of years rather than months or weeks.  In fact, I expected myself that Idealware's reports and articles would go out of date faster -- but even an article that's three years old is generally still sound in terms of the general shape of the market and the core considerations.
 
Secondly, thinking this way is only going to drive you nuts. Unless you're talking about things on the very cutting edge maturing (like, say, integrating social media activity into a CRM system), I don't think you can predict what's likely to happen in the technology world accurately enough to make decisions based on it. In fact, I'd say that the more rapid changes are likely to be the most radical... and thus the ones that you're least likely to be able to predict.
 
In short, it's pointless to wait for the world of technology to stop changing in order to make your software decisions.  You're simply not going to be able to select a system that will absolutely work for you ten years from now.  All you can do is make the best decision you can based on the information you have now. And then to actually budget to be able to select a new system and move your data every four or five years, if that's necessary.
 
Or you can wait for holographic software to emerge.  I hear it's going to change everything.